DONALD RYDELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FOURTH DISTRICT

                           DONALD RYDELL,
                              Appellant,

                                     v.

                          STATE OF FLORIDA,
                               Appellee.

                               No. 4D20-1726

                            [October 15, 2020]

   Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; John J. Murphy, III,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 08-21318 CF10A.

   Donald Rydell, Florida City, pro se.

   No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

   Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

                           *          *          *

   Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Share Review:
Yes it is. Based on the user review published on PropertyFraud.com, it is strongly advised to avoid DONALD RYDELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA in any dealing and transaction.
Not really. In spite of the review published here, there has been no response from DONALD RYDELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA. Lack of accountability is a major factor in determining trust.
Because unlike PropertyFraud.com, other websites get paid to remove negative reviews and replace them with fake positive ones.
DONALD RYDELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA is rated 1 out of 5 based on the reviews submitted by our users and is marked as POOR.
Never trust websites which offer a shady ‘advocacy package’ to businesses. Search for relevant reviews on Ripoff Report and Pissed Consumer to see more unbiased reviews.
>